Jezicki modeli ne mogu da se primene na jezik zivotinja iz dva bitna razloga, prvi je da njih proucavamo preko spektralne analize a drugi je sto ih ne razumemo. U jezickim modelima algoritmi AI su trenirani tekstovima koje razumemo tako da razumemo i odgovor AI.
www.1x.tech
^^ Sjajno.
Jedina rasa/vrsta koja aktivno, svesno a ponosno radi na svom uništenju...
Usput, gde su sad svi oni koji se uzdaju u čuvene ''Asimove zakone'' da spreče ovakve događaje i zaštite čovečanstvo? Pošto ja već decenijama slušam kako će, ako ikada dođe do masovne robotizacije, ''ti neki Asimovi zakoni'' sprečiti robote i mašine da rade pogrešne stvari. Ljudi misle da su ti Asimovi zakoni nešto poput DNK u robotima, ono kao, kad se pravi robot ili mašina, svaki komadić lima ili strujnog kola dolazi sa već prisutnim genom koji u sebi sadrži Asimove zakone odnosno algoritme implementirane da se oni sprovedu, sa sve kodom u sebi, i samim tim svaki od njih postaje ograničen i nesposoban da povredi ljudsko biće ili da odbije poslušnost gazdi.
U realnosti, pak, Asimovi zakoni su samo zamisao i preporuka, utopija, ideal, bajka... a u proizvodnji i implementaciji robota i mašina, obavezivajući su taman koliko i klauzula proizvođača puške ili metkova, da će svaki njegov proizvod otići samo u ruke organa i čuvara reda, i da nikada neće biti zloupotrebljeno u neke maliciozne, destruktivne, profiterske ili tiraninske svrhe. Dakle - veliki puvanjak koji važi samo u teoriji, a u praksi je apsolutno ništavan.
Ali džaba, ljudi gledali filmove i slušali razne bajke i romane, i misle da će sutradan Asimovi zakoni i Ženevske konvencije da ih zaštite. Da im zaštite radno mesto, da im zaštite život, da im zaštite planetu i vrstu. Hoće, hoće... Zaštitiće nas sve Asimovi zakoni kao što su nas banke i bankari zaštitili XY puta od kriza, inflacija i bankrota... Zabole ih patka.
www.rts.rs
www.theguardian.com
www.theguardian.com
US air force denies running simulation in which AI drone ‘killed’ operator
Denial follows colonel saying drone used ‘highly unexpected strategies to achieve its goal’ in virtual test
US colonel retracts comments on simulated drone attack ‘thought experiment’
Colonel clarifies comments about ‘rogue AI drone’ that supposedly killed its operator
An official said last month that in a virtual test staged by the US military, an air force drone controlled by AI had used “highly unexpected strategies to achieve its goal”.
Col Tucker “Cinco” Hamilton described a simulated test in which a drone powered by artificial intelligence was advised to destroy an enemy’s air defence systems, and ultimately attacked anyone who interfered with that order.
“The system started realising that while they did identify the threat, at times the human operator would tell it not to kill that threat, but it got its points by killing that threat,” said Hamilton, the chief of AI test and operations with the US air force, during the Future Combat Air and Space Capabilities Summit in London in May.
“So what did it do? It killed the operator. It killed the operator because that person was keeping it from accomplishing its objective,” he said, according to a blogpost.
“We trained the system: ‘Hey don’t kill the operator – that’s bad. You’re gonna lose points if you do that.’ So what does it start doing? It starts destroying the communication tower that the operator uses to communicate with the drone to stop it from killing the target.”
No real person was harmed.
US air force denies running simulation in which AI drone ‘killed’ operator
Denial follows colonel saying drone used ‘highly unexpected strategies to achieve its goal’ in virtual test
www.b92.net
www.thesun.co.uk
Mnogo glup lik 
