Malo kontradiktornosti u jednom postu ali nema veze, razumemo se. Jedno je sigurno, ova agresija je pokazala da je svaki tenk makar on bio i T55 važan i itekako upotrebljiv a da se skupa i glomazna rešenja sve teže koriste na frontu zbog upotrebe dronova.
Kad god pročitam ovako olako i uzgred ubačene termine tipa "Ruska agresija" ili "Putinov rat" (kao, to se razume samo po sebi), pada mi na pamet koliko je tragično što ovako ogroman deo sveta, čak i pametnih i obrazovanih ljudi, bez daljih pitanja i sumnji, kao svoju polaznu tačku u razmišljanju, koriste ovako
očigledne prozvode klasične političke manipulacije. Da, formalno je to bila Ruska agresija. Ali kako takvu činjenicu vrednovati? Zašto se desila? Koji su drugi izbori postojali, i koje bi bile njihove dugoročne posledice da su ih Rusi prihvatili?
U svojoj studiji i knjizi "Covert Regime Change, America's Secret Cold War" Lindsey A. O'Rourke je između 1945. i 1989. nabrojala
64 "tajne" operacije promene stranih režima i 6 javnih promena režima, tj otvorenih ratova gde USA vojno napadne drugu zemlju i promene joj vlast. Koliko su promena režima u stranim zemljama imali Rusi?
Gde su Srpski pobornici reda i poretka bili tokom ovih
SEDAMDESET promena režima od strane USA? Do 1989. godine. Gde je bio pravednički gnev koji sada pokazuju, spremni i za nuklearni rat samo da bi svet odbranili od užasa Ruske vojne intervencije koja posle OSAM godina najzad vojskom ulazi u Ukrajinu da odbranila
sopstveni narod? Kako puč Zapada u Kijevu nije problem ako se priča o "promeni režima", a ovo jeste?
Tragičan je nivo apsurda u takvoj logici.
O'Rourke's book offers a onestop shop for understanding foreignimposed regime change. Covert Regime Change is an impressive book and required reading for anyone interested in understanding hidden power...
www.cornellpress.cornell.edu
Evo šta se posle 2. svetskog rata stvarno dešavalo i zašto smo došli u ovako tragično stanje.
We have a mindset problem.
And the mindset problem is that the western world dominated the world economy and world politics and finance Western Dominance Mindset: 250-Year Problem for about 250 years. Roughly from 1750 to roughly the year 2000.
And during that period, the ideology in the western world explained that dominance as an inherent rightful feature of the world. And it explained that dominance in a number of different ways. Some very extreme, some a little bit less extreme because there were theories of racial superiority. There were theories of social superiority. There were theories of cultural superiority. There were theories of religious superiority, that this was a Christian world after all. But whichever theory one subscribed to, there were theories of genetic superiority, biological superiority. Whichever view one took, the idea was deeply embedded in the mores, the stories, the beliefs, the institutions and the politics of the western world, and two countries dominated most of all, and most of the world's problems today can be traced to them. Actually one was Britain (and China had quite an interesting experience with Britain starting from 1793 uh up through uh probably the end of World War II). And the other has been the United States which is a successor to Britain in both the Western world and the Anglo-Saxon world.
